
John Cleese attacked Stephen Miller on social media. SOURCE: MEGA
.
Global Pulse - Trending & Viral News
.
.
John Cleese attacked Stephen Miller on social media. SOURCE: MEGA
.
Global Pulse - Trending & Viral News
British comedian John Cleese didn’t hold back. The Monty Python legend revealed he has fantasized about hanging Stephen Miller—Donald Trump’s former deputy chief of staff—“by the neck.”
His shocking comment came after Miller suggested suspending habeas corpus for migrants held in federal custody. That constitutional right protects against unlawful detention, making Miller’s proposal deeply controversial.
Cleese’s blunt reaction stirred both outrage and support online, as fans debated his fiery take.
On May 10, 2025, John Cleese didn’t hold back. He slammed Stephen Miller in a tweet that quickly exploded online.
“I see Stephen Miller says he is actively thinking about suspending ‘habeas corpus…’ As this has been the keystone of the Rule of Law for centuries, I’d like to suggest that we actively think about suspending Stephen Miller… Preferably by the neck,” Cleese posted.
The John Cleese tweet struck a nerve. With its dark humor and bold imagery, it spread like wildfire across social media.
Soon, voices from both the left and right chimed in. Some praised the satire. Others called it dangerous. The free speech controversy only intensified as the tweet gained traction.
As the Stephen Miller habeas corpus remark faded into the background, Cleese’s biting response took center stage. And just like that, a sharp joke turned into a full-blown viral political commentary.
Social media didn’t stay quiet after Monty Python legend John Cleese posted his controversial jab at Stephen Miller. Reactions ranged from stunned disbelief to full-throated applause.
On platforms like X and BlueSky, users quickly amplified Cleese’s words. Many praised his boldness and sharp wit, turning the post into a trending topic.
One fan reshared the Rat Race actor’s tweet, writing, “Only John Cleese could take a political situation and turn it into this much-needed absurdity.”
Another user added to the humor by calling Miller a vampire: “Nothing a garlic-lined sarcophagus can’t fix.”
But not everyone laughed.
One commenter warned, “Sounds like a threat. Maybe we should do what the U.K. plans on doing—extradite people for offensive memes and online speech.”
The John Cleese viral tweet continues to stir debate online, highlighting just how divided audiences remain over political satire and free speech in comedy.
Stephen Miller didn’t mince words during his latest remarks from the White House. He said the administration is “actively looking” at all legal options in response to the border crisis.
Miller called the situation an “invasion,” arguing that it gives the government legal grounds for extreme action.
“The border crisis is a form of invasion,” he stated. “That gives us legal grounds to pursue every possible remedy.”
These Stephen Miller immigration comments immediately raised eyebrows. Critics and supporters alike debated the potential implications—especially his suggestion that the government could suspend habeas corpus.
He pointed to recent court decisions as a major hurdle. According to Miller, those rulings have slowed down efforts to speed up deportations.
“The Constitution is clear,” he told reporters. “It says the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended during an invasion. That’s an option we’re actively considering.”
Miller didn’t stop there. He criticized the judicial branch for blocking immigration enforcement. He argued that Congress already passed jurisdiction-stripping legislation, which limits federal courts’ involvement in immigration cases.
“At the end of the day,” he said, “Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act. It stripped Article III courts of jurisdiction over immigration cases.”
With Trump immigration policy back in the spotlight, Miller’s tough stance has reignited the national debate. Now, the focus shifts to whether the courts—or Congress—will respond.